Smart Contracts

GitMyABI

Infrastructure for Smart Contract Interfaces

Client

AxLabs (Self-funded)

Year

2026

Category

DevTooling & DevEx

Duration

6 Months

Technology Stack

Hardhat

Foundry

React

Next.js

Nest.js

Docker

MongoDB

Kubernetes

Hardhat

React

Nest.js

MongoDB

Foundry

Next.js

Docker

Kubernetes

Overview

GitMyABI is a CI/CD layer for smart contract interfaces. It automates ABI generation, versioning, hosting, and type binding delivery, turning one of Web3’s most fragile integration points into reliable infrastructure.

As decentralized applications scale, teams struggle with ABI drift between smart contracts and frontend environments. GitMyABI eliminates coordination overhead by making interfaces first-class build artifacts that are easy to consume by both humans and AI agents.

The Problem

In most Web3 teams, ABI management is still manual.


Common patterns include:

  • Copying ABI files into frontend repos

  • Publishing contracts as npm packages

  • Relying on CI scripts to detect mismatches

  • Coordinating updates via Slack/Discord

These approaches work at small scale, but they break under:

  • Multiple branches

  • Staging vs production environments

  • Rapid contract iteration

  • Multi-team collaboration

  • Proxy upgrades


When the wrong ABI is consumed, debugging becomes costly and time-consuming.

The ABI is the integration contract between backend (smart contracts) and frontend. Yet it is rarely treated as infrastructure.


How it works

GitMyABI introduces a dedicated interface layer into the smart contract development lifecycle.


Every push to a connected GitHub repository triggers:

  1. Contract build (Foundry, Hardhat, or custom command)

  2. ABI extraction

  3. Type binding generation (Typescript)

  4. Versioned artifact publishing (npm package)

  5. Immutable, addressable artifacts (per branch and commit)


This transforms the ABI from a copied file into a deterministic artifact.


Frontend teams no longer ask:

“Did you update the ABI?”


They reference:

  • A specific build

  • A branch snapshot

  • The latest successful artifact


The integration boundary becomes explicit and versioned.


How it Works

The Problem

In most Web3 teams, ABI management is still manual.


Common patterns include:

  • Copying ABI files into frontend repos

  • Publishing contracts as npm packages

  • Relying on CI scripts to detect mismatches

  • Coordinating updates via Slack/Discord

These approaches work at small scale, but they break under:

  • Multiple branches

  • Staging vs production environments

  • Rapid contract iteration

  • Multi-team collaboration

  • Proxy upgrades


When the wrong ABI is consumed, debugging becomes costly and time-consuming.

The ABI is the integration contract between backend (smart contracts) and frontend. Yet it is rarely treated as infrastructure.


How it works

GitMyABI introduces a dedicated interface layer into the smart contract development lifecycle.


Every push to a connected GitHub repository triggers:

  1. Contract build (Foundry, Hardhat, or custom command)

  2. ABI extraction

  3. Type binding generation (Typescript)

  4. Versioned artifact publishing (npm package)

  5. Immutable, addressable artifacts (per branch and commit)


This transforms the ABI from a copied file into a deterministic artifact.


Frontend teams no longer ask:

“Did you update the ABI?”


They reference:

  • A specific build

  • A branch snapshot

  • The latest successful artifact


The integration boundary becomes explicit and versioned.


How it Works

Push → Build → Extract → Version → Host → Consume

Push → Build → Extract → Version → Host → Consume

Each build produces:

  • Deterministic ABI

  • Sequential build version

  • Integrity checksum

  • Public or private npm package

  • Stable, addressable URL per build


Branch-aware artifacts allow frontend environments to map directly to corresponding contract branches, eliminating staging/prod mismatches.


Impact

With GitMyABI, teams spend less time chasing interface mismatches and more time shipping:

  • Fewer broken builds: ABI drift gets eliminated as a recurring failure mode

  • Faster frontend iteration: developers install the right package instead of hunting for the right ABI

  • Cleaner staging vs production: branch-aware artifacts reduce environment mismatches

  • Less coordination overhead: fewer “did you update the ABI?” loops across teams

  • Lower debugging cost: traceability to commits makes failures faster to pinpoint

  • Agent-ready interfaces: AI tooling can fetch the correct interfaces deterministically, saving tokens and retries


Conclusion

Smart contract interfaces shouldn’t rely on manual coordination or implicit versioning. As Web3 applications scale, the interface layer must evolve from a generated file into reliable infrastructure: consistent, traceable, and versioned.

This becomes even more important as AI agents and LLMs in IDEs start interacting with smart contracts directly. It’s not only human developers who need correct interfaces, agents do too! They need agility: deterministic lookups, correct types, and workflows that save LLM tokens so more work gets done faster, with fewer failed attempts and less back-and-forth, just like good tooling does for humans.

© Made with

♥️

in 🇨🇭 Switzerland

© Made with

♥️

in 🇨🇭 Switzerland

© Made with

♥️

in 🇨🇭 Switzerland